Our client is a private equity-backed transportation company undergoing a large-scale digital modernization of the core ERP system and several mission-critical specialized applications.
Our client is a private equity-backed transportation company undergoing a large-scale digital modernization of the core ERP system and several mission-critical specialized applications.
The client aimed to accelerate development velocity, strengthen delivery timelines, and improve QA coverage across a multi-stream engineering program, all while managing unplanned scope increases and evolving requirements. At the start of the engagement, AI tools were active on fewer than one in seven engineers' desks, with no shared workflows, no adoption governance, and no measurement baseline in place. The organization sought to introduce AI tooling into its workflows to enhance the productivity of the 140+ engineering team without adding overhead. Achieving meaningful GenAI adoption at scale, alongside a step-change in test-driven development maturity, were the client's main goals.
N-iX helped the client design and execute a structured APEX AI adoption program across the client’s six engineering work streams. The initiative was built to embed GenAI productivity directly into the software development lifecycle, rather than treating it as a standalone effort.
To achieve this, N-iX helped the client with the following areas:
Throughout the engagement, N-iX addressed key adoption barriers, such as developer skepticism, implementing security guardrails in an enterprise environment, and creating an effective AI context for a complex legacy codebase.
GenAI tool adoption rose from 13% to 91% (a 78-point increase), being the largest adoption gap closed in a single N-iX engagement. This demonstrates that structured rollout and change management are as critical as the tooling itself;
Average team velocity grew from 85 to 108.3 story points (+27%), while delivery stability improved: milestone slippage, scope creep, and chronic overtime were all brought under control;
Test coverage increased from 55% to 81%, driven by a dramatic acceleration in test creation speed;
Code review time was halved from 8–12 hours to 4–6 hours, hotfix deployment time dropped from 4–6 hours to 1–2 hours (-70%), and survey data indicated a 30% reduction in manual coding time and a 50% reduction in debugging time;
Legacy reverse engineering was reduced from 2 weeks to 2 days (-85%), and documentation generation fell from approximately 1 day to around 10 minutes.
increase in team velocity
AI adoption
faster code review
new engineer onboarding time
Briefly outline your project or challenge, and our team will respond within one business day with relevant experience and initial technical insights.